WHO are Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and John Rawls? They are the last great political thinker. Bentham was founder of Utilitarianism ,and the first defender for idea of utility. Mill has been called the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the 19th century ,and he had influenced Locke’s ideas somewhere. The last thinker ‘Rawls’ is contemporary thinker ,and he intrested in justice.
Jeremy Bentham was born England in 1748, and was a British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer.He is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism. He is first defender for idea of utility in 1800s. He intrested in sciencific set of principles for organizing politics ,and He advocated individual and economic freedom, the separation of church and state, freedom of expression, equal rights for women, the right to divorce, and the decriminalising of homosexual acts. Bentham based on Hedonistic idea but not for individual ,and he said that utilitarianism is the moral and political philosophy which claims to base its arguments and principles on the principles of the greatest happiness or principle of utility. He had adopted act utilitarian. The work for which Bentham most is known: The Principle of Moral and Legislation(published in 1789).’Happiness is the sun around whisch Bentham’s other ideas,like planets,travel , and his opinion, words without meaning unless they refer to happiness.’ He has two sovereign masters ; pain and pleasure. One intrinsic good – happiness.’Everything we do is determined by pleasure seeking and pain-avoiding.’ Pleasure-pain principle has a natural biological basis.
John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher, born in 1806, political economist and civil servant. He was an influential contributor to social theory, political theory and political economy. He has been called the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century. He was utilitarian, and as a political ciritic Mill was a liberal. His best known political works ; On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. For Mill on Liberty, by liberty, was meant protection against the tyranny of the political rulers. It was attempted in two ways . First, by obtaining a recognition of certain immunities, called political liberties or rights. A second and generally a later expedient , was the establishment of constitutional checks etc. people are not always so autonomous.Worse, they are subject to ‘the tyranny of the majority’. In political speculations ‘the tyranny of the majority’ is now generally included among the evils against which society requires to be on its guard.
He specify liberties as such;
- the first liberty is also meant to include ‘the liberty of expressing and publishing opinions.’
- the principle requires liberty of tastes and pursuits ; and we do not harm to others.
- freedom this liberty of each individual follows the liberty within same limits, of combination among individuals, freedom to unite for any purpose not involving harm to others.
In his opinion, respected is free; and none is completely free in which they do not exist absolute and unqualified ,and also liberalism places a high value individual freedom construed as personal autonomy. Mill ask me this questition : Why should I have freedom of the thought ?
He explained the question at four steps.
- if we disapprove the truths. To deny this is to assume our own infallibility.
- common thoughts are not always true in absolute terms. Truths show up from opposite ideas.
- accepting something without debate true or absolute truths is prejudge.
- you should interrogate ideas. If you do not interrogate these ideas , they will be tabu ,and they will inhibit your opinions.
The other subject is ‘The Subjection of Women’ . Mill was defending equal of gender basically. There is a hierarchy of slaves ,and woman are worse condition than slaves. For example, children owners are man ,and when man was died , children was not abandoned the women .
For Rawls, there are two principles of justice.
- each person is to have an equal right to most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with similar system of liberty for all.
- social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both. He based on well-order society .
Distribution of primary social goods which to give people ‘rights and liberties ,and opportunity and power ,and wealth and income’. Liberty is a primary good. The just society is the liberal society in which the basic liberties are protected. Rawls has ‘original position’ idea. He places his imaginary choosers behind a ‘hypothetical’ ‘veil of ignorance’. The principles of justice are choosen behind a veil of ignorance. The most important thing for Rawls is ‘Justice is fairness’ . In justice as fairness the original position of equality corresponds to the state of nature in the traditional theory of the social contract. Important political, social and economic instituations , consisting of the political constitution and the principle economic and social arrangements make up the ‘basic structure’ of society.
The basic structure will define men’s rights and duties and influence their life prospects. It is very important that the basic structure of society is just , so that each of us gets a fair go in life. For us, the primary subject of justice is te basic structure of society. For Rawls, it is self-intrested point. You can turn out to be the most disadvantaged person ,and also try to maximize the benefits of the least advantaged person. Veil of ignorance is known nothing . Genes, family, country, gender, ethnicity. They are all random. Differences between us are arbitrary. If we know these options , How do we want to be a society ? Rawls is the object of politicians, judiciaries and then people are coming . The finally , the basic purpose of his book ‘The Theory of Justice’ is not fair , its aim is to order.
YUSUF TANER KILAVUZ